Followup to: <20030519105152.GD8978@holomorphy.com>
By author: William Lee Irwin III <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> IIRC you're supposed to use some sort of sanitized copy, not the things
> directly. IMHO the current state of affairs sucks as there is no
> standard set of ABI headers, but grabbing them right out of the kernel
> is definitely not the way to go.
This "cure" sucks worse than the disease. Now you're putting it onto
everyone who maintains userspace to do the same repetitive task of
"sanitizing" this. Especially for things this trivial, this is a
For 2.7, getting real exportable ABI headers is so bloody necessary
it's not even funny. However, for 2.5, breaking things randomly is
not the way to go.
-- <email@example.com> at work, <firstname.lastname@example.org> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:36 EST