From: Andrew Morton <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 00:47:07 -0700
To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK AIM9] Regressions in 2.5.69
> "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Hi all/Andrew/Martin,
> > I noticed regression in a few tests,
> > I deleted the results of tests that don't show differences between the two kernel version.
> > Hope it helps.
> > Ciao,
> > Paolo
> > 2.5.67
> > 2.5.69
> > creat-clo 10010 86.8132 86813.19 File Creations and Closes/second
> > creat-clo 10030 22.0339 22033.90 File Creations and Closes/second
> > ^^^^BIG REGRESSION
> I cannot repeat any of this. In fact 2.5.69-mm is a bit faster than
> I tested ext2 mainly. But a spot-check of creat-clo on reiserfs showed
> no regression either.
Ok, thanks Andrew.
I dunno what happened during the test.
I'll try again to run the test with both the kernel.
I'll back to you if I'm able to reproduce those numbers.
-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:24 EST