On Friday 04 April 2003 20:36, Robert Woerle Paceblade/Support wrote:
> now i get this when i try to compile 2.4.20 with any swsusp patch !! (
> tried , beta19 and beta19-14 and beta19-16)
> the thing i changed is that i now use Suse 8.2 and before i had suse 8.1
> and everything was fine .
> i dont know if there is a gcc differenc between those 2 but it looks
> like !!
> Cheers Rob
> cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20/include -Wall
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
> -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686
> -malign-functions=0 -malign-jumps=0 -malign-loops=0 -nostdinc
> -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=sched -fno-omit-frame-pointer -c
> -o sched.o sched.c
> cc1: warning: -malign-loops is obsolete, use -falign-loops
> cc1: warning: -malign-jumps is obsolete, use -falign-jumps
> cc1: warning: -malign-functions is obsolete, use -falign-functions
> sched.c: In function `schedule':
> sched.c:611: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> sched.c:640: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> sched.c:709: internal compiler error: in merge_assigned_reloads, at
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
The obsolete messages point to some gcc-3x. It is no good for kernel compiles because there are many complex tricks in the kernel.
You ought to use gcc2.95-3. You can look for gcc295 compat package and libs at suse site.
P.S. Official compiler _is_ gcc2.95-3 also for 2.5 series. This is _not_ "obsolete" documentation.
Could someone authoritative from kernel list please confirm that above still applies
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:22 EST