Hi!
> > I concur with your pros and cons. This makes me think that if S4BIOS support
> > ever gets added, it should get added to 2.4 only.
And S4BIOS will never get added to 2.4 since it needs driver model
:-(.
> That assumes no box exists where S4bios works an S4 doesnt (eg due to
> bad tables or "knowing" what other-os does)
We have full control over S4 (== swsusp), so we can fix that in most
cases.
S4BIOS is still little friendlier to the user -- no need to set up
swap partition and command line parameter, can't go wrong if you boot
without resume=, etc.
Pavel
-- Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building, cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST