Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated

From: Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Date: Thu Apr 11 2002 - 13:00:37 EST

Next message: Ted Deppner: "Re: New IDE code and DMA failures"
Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: arch/sparc64/kernel/traps.c"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11 April 2002 09:36, David S. Miller wrote:
> No, you must block truncate operations on the file until the client
> ACK's the nfsd read request if you wish to use sendfile() with
> nfsd.

Which shouldn't be a big performance problem unless I am unaware
of some real-life applications doing heavy truncates.

--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ted Deppner: "Re: New IDE code and DMA failures"
Previous message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: arch/sparc64/kernel/traps.c"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated"
Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST