On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:41:11 -0700,
Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> wrote:
>Then you'd just need to make sure that if there are any block modules linked
>into the kernel that raid is also linked into the kernle instead of a module.
>
>Is there some reason why this wouldn't work (except for CML1
>complications...)?
>
>Kieth, will kbuild2.5 affect this in any way? Or is this entirely a CML2
>thing?
AFAICT it is pure config. kbuild 2.5 does not care how .config is
built, it just requires a clean .config. I want a clean seperation
between configuring and building the kernel. In particular, Makefile
rules should not try to adjust for broken config entries, this is a
config only problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST