Re: implementing soft-updates

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 14:24:20 EST


Dominik Kubla <kubla@sciobyte.de> writes:

> The background fsck capability, just like journalling or logging, are
> typically only in needed in 24/7 systems (sure, they are nice to have in
> your home system, but do you _REALLY_ need them? i don't!) and those
> system typically are run on proven hardware which is operated well
> within the specs. So please don't construct these kinds of arguments.

You can already do background fsck on a linux system today. Just do it on
a LVM/EVMS snapshot.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:00:16 EST