Chris Mason [firstname.lastname@example.org] wrote:
> > Clearly, there would also have to be a mechanism to flush the cache on
> > unmount, so if this were done by ioctl, would you prefer that the filesystem
> > be in charge of flushing the cache on barrier writes, or would you like the sd
> > device to do it transparently?
> How about triggered by closing the block device. That would also cover
> people like oracle that do stuff to the raw device.
Doing something in sd_release should be covered in the raw case.
At least from what I understand of the raw release call path :-).
-- Michael Anderson email@example.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:42 EST