Re: 2.5.2-pre2 forces ramfs on

From: Christoph Rohland (cr@sap.com)
Date: Thu Dec 27 2001 - 05:39:22 EST


Hi Al,

On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> What's more, quite a few ramfs methods are good candidates for
> library functions, since they are already shared with other
> filesystems and number of such cases is going to grow.

Comments on the following set of patches?

1) Add a removepage operation to the address_space_operations which
   simplifies the size checking heavily. This is not strictly needed.
2) Add a ramfs(2) incorporation to shmem.c which disables the swapping
   and does not allocate the swap vector for shmem.c files.

We would gain a full ramfs with size checking, error checking and
correct time stamping with a very small change.

Greetings
                Christoph





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:13 EST