On Mon, 2001-12-24 15:09:07 -0500, Mr. James W. Laferriere <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
wrote in message <Pine.LNX.4.43.0112241507550.31883-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>:
>
> Hello Jan , Is this possibly related to a ECN enabled host &
> somewhere in between a Non-ECN enabled (or a cisco router) ?
That would give a different result: "functional TCP connections" or
"non-functional TCP connections". Mine are between that. If data gets
sent in small chunks, everything is fine, but if it's a larger
transfer (more than one ethernet frame may transport???), write()
stalls (or non-blocking write returns), but data is kept in
Send-Q rather than being sent down to the client.
Well, my setup is a LAN, everything here is fully functional wrt.
ECN. I've never switched ECN off, and 2.4.x is running since ages
on the boxes around. So it's definitely *not* ECN in this case:-(
MfG, JBG
-- Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 -- New APT-Proxy written in shell script -- http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:10 EST