On Thu, 1 Nov 2001 13:06:00 +0100
Tim Jansen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 November 2001 11:32, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > I believe that rewriting /proc (and /proc/sys should simply die) is a
> > better solution than extending the interface, or avoiding it
> > altogether by using a new filesystem.
> I am currently working on something like this, too. It's using Patrick
> Mochel's driverfs patch
> as a base and adds the functionality of the extensions that I did to proc fs
> for my device registry patch
Firstly: obviously, I think that work on /proc is a worthy and excellent
thing to be doing: everyone has been complaining about it since its introduction
(for good reason).
I'm not sure about such explicit typing: see my patch (the existing types are
only for convenience: you can trivially supply your own). I agree with the
"one file, one value" idea. I also went for dynamic directories for those who
don't want to continually register/deregister.
I suggest you read my patch 8)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 21:00:17 EST