I believe you and It's sure that I have not tested all cases.
So do you see a way to use a private data buffer ?
On Wed, 23 May 2001 16:55:57 Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:50:28PM +0200, christophe barbé wrote:
> > I don't know about socket but I allocate myself the skbuff and I set
> > destructor (and previously the pointer value is NULL). So I don't
> > a destructor.
> That just means you didn't test all cases; e.g. not TCP or UDP
> > I believe net/core/sock.c is not involved in my problem but I can be
> > What is worrying me is that I don't know who clones my skbuff and why.
> skbuffs are cloned all over the stack for various reasons.
> > To said everything, I know who clones my skbuff because it causes a
> > when it tries to free my buffer If I use my destructor.
> Because you're mistakely using a private field.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> the body of a message to email@example.com
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Christophe Barbé Software Engineer - firstname.lastname@example.org Lineo France - Lineo High Availability Group 42-46, rue Médéric - 92110 Clichy - France phone (33).1.41.40.02.12 - fax (33).1.41.40.02.01 http://www.lineo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 23 2001 - 21:00:52 EST