On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 09:48:02PM +0400, email@example.com wrote:
> > Btw, you don't schedule the ksoftirqd thread if do_softirq() returns
> > from the 'if(in_interrupt())' check.
> ksoftirqd will not be switched to before the first schedule
> or ret form syscall, when softirqs will be processed in any case.
> So, wake up in this case would be mistake.
> The _real_ problem is softirqs generated from another softirqs:
> additonal thread is made _not_ to speed up softirqs, but to _tame_
> them (if I understood Andres's explanations correctly).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:00:11 EST