On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dimitris Michailidis wrote:
> > the attached sched-2.4.0-test7-C1 patch fixes a 'missed wakeup'
> > SMP-scheduler bug.
> + if (prev == idle_task(smp_processor_id()))
> + goto out_unlock;
> Why don't you move the test for the idle task to the beginning of the
> function so we don't need to take the run queue lock if prev is idle? There
> is nothing to be done for idle tasks, we don't even need to set ->has_cpu.
for performance reasons. The whole running_again path is extremely rare
(because the window for a re-wakeup is small), so i moved all checks into
the slow path and made the common code fall-through.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 21:00:23 EST