Alan Cox wrote:
> You have to have some per security level swap pools or randomising (and the
> per security swap pool is more effective anyway) since it stops people slapping
> a viterbi codec across the memory signalling and laughing at your randomised
> errors.
--- Good point....um, what's a "viterbi" codec? Now I wonder if a VMware type of approach with each VM having it's own 'committed' virtual swap would approach the type of compartmentalisation needed (?). Would have to figure out a way for different VM's at the same security level to communicate w/each other...-l
-- Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 31 2000 - 21:00:18 EST