On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>I think yes.
>This is one possible implementation against 2.3.52pre1:
FYI: I got now a crash with such patch applyed. Precisely the below BUG
triggered (in smp.c smp_invalidate_interrupt):
if (!test_bit(cpu, &flush_cpumask))
I'm not sure right now if that's a bug in the diff or not...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 15 2000 - 21:00:27 EST